- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism, couldn't find any references to this term via google. Delete unless notable sites using this term can be found. Wokon (talk · contribs · logs) created the article as their 3rd edit.--Andeh 10:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's something funny going on. See User:Wokon and compare with the article. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 10:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MUSIC appears to be band vanity (per the userpage) and apparently they feel they've created a new genre of music as well. No evidence they meet the WP:MUSIC criteria though.--Isotope23 13:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC miserably, but succeeds at WP:BJAODN Rock On ! DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT WHAT I MESSED UP 16:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Dewete it's like Elmer Fudd and KISS's love child. Huh-huh-huh-huh-huh. Danny Lilithborne 00:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.