Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolverine Carbide and Tool
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Both wholly promotional and no indication of notable. Should have been speedied earlier. DGG ( talk ) 21:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Wolverine Carbide and Tool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N Mason Doering (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:21, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - vanity self-praising insert by blocked spamusername account for Wolverine, a tiny (30 people) company; full of fluff. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, really obvious advertisement with no good purpose. --EM64T (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - per above. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:43, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.