- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One of the stupidest entries I've ever seen. It's tagged as "send to Wiktionary", but Wiktionary can't make anything useful of this entry. A possible nonce word this Dangherous 15:12, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Ezeu 16:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it. Delete it with fire. --Stlemur 16:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete... with gusto. Remy B 17:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Esquizombi 17:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Where (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If there were an article on "Whoop", I would say redirect, but there isn't. (BTW, I love "delete with fire".) --Allen 22:43, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete absurd. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Stlemur. I'll bring some gasoline, or maybe a bottle of rubbing alcohol from the medicine cabinet. Haikupoet 04:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete infantile, ambiguous, useless. Moe Aboulkheir 05:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.