- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 15:07Z
As I already wrote in May 2006: It still seems like a neologism to me. When I search Google for "workic", I get mainly pages that *mention* (rather than *use*) the word, as in "Workic" is not in the dictionary. Aleph4 14:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Workoholic. Robertissimo 14:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems an original research (the name). Content copied from Workoholic (see page history). Non notable word (very few ghits), so no redirect. Cate | Talk 15:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per reasons stated by Cate. Hatch68 18:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN, Wikipedia is not a place for nonsense jargon. Davidpdx 10:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.