- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
del. No claims of notability for this piece of software. mikkanarxi 01:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 01:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator, as it seems to fail the proposed WP:SOFTWARE guidelines. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 02:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 06:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Just added a couple of sources in. Need conversion into wikitext syntax, however. Westenra 07:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Nashville Monkey 12:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to WP:Software. TSO1D 14:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:SOFTWARE. Terence Ong 15:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the same reason given in the nomination. ArmAndLeg 21:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - rewrite still doesnt bring it above the WP:SOFTWARE level...SkierRMH,07:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.