Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldcore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Worldcore

Worldcore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:PROMO article on an unremarkable fintech company. The claim to notability are minor industry awards, including "European Fintech Awards 2016" and being ranked "Number One Fintech company from Czech Republic by Scalable Capital". The latter article was recently deleted at an AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scalable Capital, so these two may be related. I recently removed a swath of "product brochure" content (diff) but what remains is not convincing. PROD removed by article creator. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as literally a bombarded advertisement specifying literally only what the company wants to say about itself, the sources are themselves mirroring this so they cannot therefore be taken seriously especially if it's actually PR. The history shows several new accounts noticeably focusing with this one article so it's clear to say this is only existing for company-controlled advertising. SwisterTwister talk 04:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete and being sourced to Bitcoin blogs is evidence against notability - David Gerard (talk) 10:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.