Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worst Genocide in Human History

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 03:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Worst Genocide in Human History

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

blatant POV violation Omegastar (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 16:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per the nominator's concern on POV. Warrah (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as POV. Does this mean that some examples of genocide are "better" than others? Mandsford (talk) 02:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete based on POV violation. This isn't neutral and any article singling one event out as the worst genocide ever can't be made in something NPOV either. I hope WP:SNOW and WP:BEANS get invoked here soon, because there's no snowball's chance in hell this is going to survive based on that one flaw. - Mgm|^(talk) 18:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Highly dubious failing proper sourcing and POV. User has a history of making egregiously biased edits. Perhaps someone should take a look at his history and report him at ANI. Talk page warnings have been ignored in the past. Nirvana888 (talk) 00:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsalvageable, though the 2 quotes from historians do deserve to be sourced as references in an article, if not already.(but not using this reference, as its not reliable.) and yes, if the creator has a history like this, someone needs to get involved.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW as worse POV ever. Bearian (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but clean it up. Articles be rewritten. --UgaBullDawgFan08 (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsalvageable POV. Edward321 (talk) 19:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: POV. Joe Chill (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
20 Mule-Team Delete: This is pretty much a WP:BULLSHIT case. RGTraynor 03:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.