Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Written Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 04:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Written Images

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced (except an IMDb page, which isn't sourcing) article about a film, slated for release in 2016, that has yet to even begin production. ~~and in fact even its crowdfunding campaign still isn't fully funded as of today (raising my sneaking suspicion that this was really created to help advertise it.~~ No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when reliable source coverage about the film actually exists, but right now is WP:TOOSOON. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 07:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The most recent Kickstarter campaign ended before this article was created (it ended on November 6th), so I don't think that this was a case of someone creating an article to advertise a crowdsourcing campaign. However at the same time, this as-of-yet uncreated film is still not notable enough to merit an article. All I can find is an article in the Columbia Chronicle, but that's not enough to really show notability. At best this is just WP:TOOSOON for this to have an article. On a side note I'd like to recommend to User:Thx14sdx24 (if he is the director) that he may want to look into IndieGoGo or one of the other crowdsourcing campaigns that would allow you to keep any money that is donated, whereas Kickstarter will only give you the funds if your goal is reached. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The really weird thing is that when I looked at the Kickstarter page less than two minutes before I filled out the nomination, it was displaying as an open campaign that one could still donate to, not as a failed or closed one. Possibly a technical snafu on their part, I suppose. Regardless, I'll strike that part of my rationale. Bearcat (talk) 10:44, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFF as they haven't stated filming yet. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as being far TOO SOON for an article. Allow recreation or undeletion only after it begins filming and gains the requisite coverage. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.