Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Pol: the Explicit Polarization Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

X-Pol: the Explicit Polarization Theory

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

X-Pol: the Explicit Polarization Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear notable, is based entirely on primary citations all from J.Goa EvilxFish (talk) 15:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I found no reference to this technique that wasn't either a Wikipedia mirror or was written by the same person who coined the name. No independent sources. Agricolae (talk) 10:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No independent sources, written by SPA to promote it. Reywas92^Talk 19:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.