Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X10 camera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as copyvio. Capitalistroadster 04:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page violates the 'no advertisement' rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justin Hirsh (talk • contribs)

• Delete, blatant ad. Royboycrashfan 00:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. -- Scientizzle 00:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as spam. No reason it can't redirect to X10 Wireless Technology after deletion though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as its a copy-vio of [1] (warning, usual horrible X10 color schemes on that page. Ugh) Gwernol 00:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - blatant ad and copyvio from X10 Cameras website. —ERcheck @ 01:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect per above. Amcfreely 02:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as copyvio per Gwernol, tagged as such. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 03:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per Gwernol; copyvio --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.