- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 00:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Never heard of this critic; didn't pass Google test CobaltBlueTony 04:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I finally found the website this article references: [1]. That's the entirety of it, as far as I can tell, clearly non-notable and unverifiable. Gwernol 05:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Richardcavell 06:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - NN & per promises of what the show/critic will offer in future, WP:NOT a crystal ball. Colonel Tom 11:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 11:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Gyre 02:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 20:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -Myxomatosis 08:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. cBuckley (Talk • Contribs) 10:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GassyGuy 15:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.