- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to OpenXMA. There is a clear consensus, that a separate article for this software isn't warrented. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 10:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- XMA (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero notability found. Non-notable software. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Redirect. Could be redirected to OpenXMA, the content of which isn't all that different from this article. A redirect only makes sense if editors think that OpenXMA is sufficiently notable to keep.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems to be only covered in press release republishing sources. OpenXMA should probably follow it, though not in this discussion. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to OpenXMA, as suggested. DGG ( talk ) 02:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.