- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 09:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- X Plus-Minus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article is about a method to predict movements in financial markets. I think the topic is not verifiable because there are no sources on it except for the website of the company that has developed the method. It is a very new method; only a few weeks of data is available on the website. The method is not described on the website and I can't find any previous analysis. The article was speedily deleted under the "blatant advertising" clause (and re-created) but I don't think it qualifies as that. Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it qualifies for Speedy Delete as spam because the only source for the information is a self promoting website. However, in the interest of fairness I did google it and didn't find any reliable third party sources for Notability so it probably fails on that anyway. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete private (insert your phrase here) fails WP:N everytime. ArcAngel (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Jitse. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.