Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus on non-notability JForget 00:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Limited notability, unreferenced. ℳøℕø 02:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is about an image browser for Mac OS X. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
Delete unless someone adds evidence of independent coverage. Pcap ping 18:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℳøℕø 00:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy~~ Delete as a non-notable project/ organization. 2 says you, says two 01:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete as non-notable, and trivial (it does much the same, but a lot less, than Preview) so it unlikely ever to become notable.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 01:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I opened a file and saw that this was the default application. As I had never heard of Xee, I wanted to get some objective and concise info and landed on this Wikipedia page only to find out you're planning to delete this entry. Oh well. Maybe it's not as "notable" or well-covered as Preview, but sometimes I'd like to know stuff about obscure applications without resorting to company PR materials. Is this no longer one of Wikipedia's purposes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.126.25 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.