- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 16:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
This is nothing more than blatant marketing for a company and a black SEO one at that. asmodai 08:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. This could have been {{prod}}ed, in fact. JesseW, the juggling janitor 08:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- I wish we could elevate to prod, but I guess i'll just delete. Alba 13:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete ad. JPD (talk) 14:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete spamvertisement Bucketsofg 14:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as advertisement--TBC
??? ??? ??? 16:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC) - Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 17:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- What does being black have to do with this, asmodai? --Boborok 01:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Nothing. "Black SEO" refers to "black hat search engine optimization". Catamorphism 02:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, spam, bad article. Catamorphism 02:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, spam, awful article, and they aren't very good in the Evil SEO Techniques if they can't even integrate the content to Wikipedia, now can they? Not funny enough to survive though. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.