Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xi Chapter of Psi Upsilon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xi Chapter of Psi Upsilon

According to WP:ORG, individual chapters of national organizations are not usually notable in themselves. Prod removed by creator, see article talk page for his explanation, which, summarized, is that he disagrees with the guideline. FisherQueen (Talk) 22:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn suborganization of a fraternity. Carlossuarez46 18:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete CSD-A7. Article makes no assertion of the chapter's notability outside of the very local area. The consensus at WP:FRAT is that individual chapters shouldn't have articles unless they are especially notable for some reason.—Elipongo (Talk contribs) 21:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
RTFM -- The original author explains, clearly and concisely, on the article talk page (as acknowledged by FisherQueen]], who has at least read it) the far braoder impact of this chapter. This ought never to have been brought to deletion -- it is an example of proper recognisition of outstanding achievement. -- Jubelum
Delete--for consistency's sake, this needs to be deleted. The case for notablity has not been made (I read the discussion)DIDouglass 04:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.