- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) 01:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable software from a company that uses Wikipedia as an advertising avenue. See RegCure Bahustard 19:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable and the references are not from independent sources (nor are they reliable) --Childzy ¤ Talk 22:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - As stated in another discussion... this "new" user with no past edit history has come out of the woodwork to plaster Wikipedia with deletion requests for all the products of a single company. This should raise a few red flags as to the motive of the AfD. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.119.134 (talk) 15:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Meanwhile, the chief defense has come from an anon IP who does nothing but work on Paretologic articles. So I think it cancels out. Bahustard 19:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep despite the original author's clear intention to plug the product. There is an attempt to address a controversy over the product being suspected as a kind of trojan. The article would benefit from a fuller treatment of this, and greater impartiality overall. I also wonder why a related product also has a Wikipedia article but with the spelling "XOFTspy." See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XOFTspy Portable Anti-Spyware, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ParetoLogic Privacy Controls, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RegCure, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ParetoLogic. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 04:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This software is MALWARE. It destroys computers. This is not a safe article, and is undermining Wikipedia's credibility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.78.150.119 (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.