- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. With a side of nomination withdrawn. Issues can be addressed via editing Star Mississippi 12:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- YNAB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, included sources are mostly regurgitated PR or reviews of the service or app, not in-depth "Independent Content" about the company. HighKing++ 12:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. HighKing++ 12:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Many of these sources look paid. Raymond3023 (talk) 08:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Since this is the same nomination reason used for Splitwise, I'll use the same keep rationale. If the issue is that the lead is phrased as focusing on the company not the app, then let's just change that. Absolutely no reason to jump to deletion here when the app is very clearly notable. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 16:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Note that this is the second nomination for this article - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Need a Budget (2013, closed as no consensus). Agree with User:Bsoyka - the application has sufficient coverage in secondary sources. The article does need some work on integrating the available sources in a more meaningful way. Dreamyshade (talk) 16:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - propose to withdraw nomination As Bsoyka said above, just as with Splitwise, the issues with the article can be solved by refocussing the article on the app/software/service rather than the company. The sourcing around the app/service/software appears to meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. There is already a Delete !vote so I won't close it myself but perhaps a passing admin might do so. HighKing++ 12:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.