- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete with no prejudice against recreation if/ when reliable sources can be located to susbtantiate assertions of notability. JERRY talk contribs 04:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yaar Mohammad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non notable and totally Unreferenced both references are from a forum talk page written by the author.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Don't even know if it's real. Should have been a speedy. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep if someone finds sources--it should be in the published histories of the period, though it would probably take a library, not the web, to find them. It asserted importance, though, so it could not possibly be a speedy. Asserting someone is commander in chief of a national army is clearly asserting notability, and if it can be shown from any reference source that he held that position, he';s notable beyond any question. Tipu was certainly real enough, and so was his army. It fought the British for years. DGG (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy Talk 07:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. Yahel Guhan 08:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.