Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yahoo! Kids(3rd Nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Good rescue (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 21:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Yahoo! Kids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete: Poorly Written and provides no sources. Merge or Delete. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 22:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Which one do you want? Merger or deletion? Only for the latter should you come to Articles for deletion. Article merger does not involve deletion, or AFD, in any way. Uncle G (talk) 23:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Deletion. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 10:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A Google news archive search provided many reliable sources; passes WP:WEB. The real problem is that the article needs to be developed to incorporate the sources that are out there. Narthring (talk • contribs) 02:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Yahoo - it doesn't require a separate page of its own, considering that the entry it has is already small enough to be stubbed. Put it in with Yahoo!'s page and be done with. BarkingFish 23:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Yahoo!. No need for a separate article. TomCat4680 (talk) 06:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't understand the argument for merging instead of keeping. Is it just because the article is so small right now? At one time this was a popular service and there are a lot of reliable, nontrivial sources out there that just haven't been incorporated into the article. Narthring (talk • contribs) 04:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I believe that was the reason. However, those concerns have now been rectified. Cunard (talk) 09:11, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per my rewrite. Notability is clearly established. Cunard (talk) 09:11, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep good rescue. Racepacket (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.