Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yahoo! Style Guide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yahoo! Style Guide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability in October 2010, but still no indication of independent coverage. — Bdb484 (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I cannot find any significant independent coverage of this book by secondary sources. --Noleander (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no indicia of notabilityCurb Chain (talk) 11:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.