- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't assert notability. Refs are unreliale sources. Etc. Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I'm inclined to encourage authors to demonstrate notability with sources other than the org's own website. The link to the Ontario Ministry of Education is unhelpful, as it contains no refs to Yan Yan Tang. Surely someone outside the org has taken notice of it in writing? If not, out it goes. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 02:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment some coverage from China Radio International [1] about their cooperation with other organisations in a missing persons case. Only other thing I could find was Ming Pao's Toronto edition printing what looks like one of their press releases. [2]. cab 06:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GreenJoe 20:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- weak delete. Looks real, but no independent source given or easily found, therefore fails Wikipedia:Notability. No other article links to it. --SmokeyJoe 10:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.