Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow arch studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow arch studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy, promotional, unreferenced non encyclopedic article about a non-notable recording studio. Speedy declined due to the alleged notability of 2 bands that rehearse there, but notability is not inherited. WuhWuzDat 22:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk)
Strong Delete. A few hits in GNews, but all about other topics that happen to mention the studios. And couldn't be any more spammy if it was encased in tins and stacked on the shelves of my local Sainsbury's. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I've removed all the spammy promotional rubbish (which is something anyone could have done), and added some references, I'll try and find more but I think that a good start. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Legitimate for the history of a specific local musical scene, used by notable bands and performers. --AStanhope (talk) 03:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Notability is no inherited, just because a facility is used by notable people does not necessarily make it notable itself. Thryduulf (talk) 08:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete It's certainly verifiable it exists, but none of the mentioned sources in the article are significant (or about the studio itself) thus not meeting the criteria for WP:GNG. Martin Raybourne (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How about Merging it into Neepsend, the town where the studio is located?--Pink Bull (talk) 21:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per original reasoning of AFD--Amadscientist (talk) 22:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.