Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Canley (talk) 00:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Note how the word no is a dab page, as it should be. RightGot (talk) 21:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep - spurious nomination by troll. See User_talk:RightGot, User_talk:RightGot/Archive_1 and WP:ANI#RightGot andy (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Discusses notable usage of the word, more than a dicdef. Tevildo (talk) 00:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep per andy. Jonathan 00:19, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.