- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yoomoot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was speedy deleted as an A7 but was recreated during the deletion review. The original speedy was endorsed but there was consensus that the sourcing on this improved version required a discussion before further deletion could be considered. This is a procedural nomination as the closer of the DRV and I thereby express no personal opinion on this article Spartaz Humbug! 06:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:WEB; very new site, come back when it's notable please. Stifle (talk) 13:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Appears to fail WP:WEB. ttonyb (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are 3 articles primarily on this topic all seemingly from reliable sources. Thus meets WP:N and criteria 1 WP:WEB. Hobit (talk) 05:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The last article isn't independent per se, but the fact they asked a founder to write the article about the broader topic would seem to indicate a third party evaluation of the importance of the company. Hobit (talk) 05:49, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Techcrunch is a blog. Never heard of thrillist. Please read over WP:RS. Stifle (talk) 08:36, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Techcrunch calls itself a webblog but I'd have to say it is structured much like a newspaper including having a professional journalist as the editor. I'm also missing the part of WP:RS where any news source Stifle hasn't heard of doesn't count as an RS :-). But I'll post both to the appropriate noticeboard later to get further input on both. Hobit (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB, which isn't surprising considering it just launched. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.