Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're Not Sorry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're Not Sorry

Fails WP:NSONGS. Source does not relate to anything about it being a future single. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 05:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For God's sake, what's the big hurry? Love Story isn't even done yet. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 12:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand now that it's actually charted on the Hot 100. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A non-notable single. Schuym1 (talk) 13:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vote Changed to Keep: per TPH. Schuym1 (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per The Hammer. Like he said, what's the rush. Keep :-) Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 21:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's not even an official single.--Caldorwards4 (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it's at #11 on the Billboard Hot 100 which should make it notable now. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, I'm not sorry But feel free to bring this back if Taylor Swift's release makes the top ten on Billboard. Mandsford (talk) 01:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now that's debuted at #11 on the Billboard Hot 100 (a notable chart), that should make it meet WP:SONGS and notable. Holiday56 (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Of course it's going to be a keeper, and I think this demonstrates the problems in both creating and nominating articles too quickly. What's the point of creating an an article before a song is released? On the other hand, if it's a single from an established artist like Taylor Swift, why assume that it's not going to be noticed? I must foolishly stick to my principles of course, for I said to come back when it makes the top ten, not the top eleven! Sorry, just missed the cut. Mandsford (talk) 23:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Song is in the Top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100, therefore it meets WP:SONGS. Eric444 (talk) 09:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.