- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 01:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It looks okay to me. What's the problem?
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:44, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as corp spam. Peyna 16:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP and no evidence of having understood WP enough to realise that there might be a need to. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 17:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it was a more notable company, it'd deserve keeping. But it's not as it is, so away it must go. --Impaciente 17:36, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Corp spam, and someone keeps trying to insert spamlinks for this site into cell phone articles. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Advertising. Colonel Tom 04:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.