- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. A Traintalk 12:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Personal promotion, not sufficiently notable. Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm surprised this article has lasted two years. Notability not asserted except by self-published site. Nearly a copyvio, but text is slightly changed. Realkyhick 23:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep It isn't a good article, but the subject is notable enough due to taking part in several major art shows, if still not verified as such. If someone could add sources and reviews, then it would be okay. Poeloq 08:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep article in its current state is not attributed to verifiable independant sources, but it does assert that such sources exist. I believe that the article can be improved and does not meet deletion criteria. Jerry 20:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel Bryant 03:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent sourcing, no evidence of subject's notability. Xukuth 06:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced.--cj | talk 02:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - see [1] and [2] for notability. However, the article should possibly be on the Magicbike instead, which is the subject of almost all of Gitman's notability. --Mary quite contrary (hai?) 18:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.