- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yusuf Najmuddin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be no significant coverage in reliable sources. See all-dates Google news archive search and Google web search. There are tons of other possible sources, but none is cited here. Most happy to be demonstrated wrong, and will withdraw nom if so. Bongomatic 14:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only one article that goes on a discourse about a book of his. Sure he was a pretty cool guy, but this article also reads like an obituary. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as notability has not been established by sufficient secondary sources. Symplectic Map (talk) 01:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No clear assertion of significance. Notability not established via 3rd RS. Dlohcierekim 00:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.