Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuuka Akama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yuuka Akama

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Yuuka Akama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of TV announcer sourced only by the website of the TV station for which she works. Nothing here shows she passesWP:ANYBIO or WP:SIGCOV. Cabayi (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unencyclopedic topic coverage and tone aside, search of Japanese language sources does not find significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, so subject does not meet WP:GNG. Corresponding jawiki article sourced to employer web sites, cheerleader blog, press releases, Twitter, and dead links to old events, so it has the same problem. Which is not surprising, given that the jawiki article is almost entirely edited by the same highly focused article creator as this enwiki version. Bakazaka (talk) 21:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This subject does not meet WP:GNG. As simple as that. All of the sources are going to her biography but that doesn't establish notability. Seeing at her work doesn't give me much results as well. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no evidence of qualifying the requirement of WP:GNG. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 18:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.