- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ZY Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Law firm that does not appear to pass notability criteria of WP:ORG. Current sources listed mainly come from the firm's own website. Other sources include one blog and an Intellectual Property website that doesn't mention the firm. Tone is somewhat promotional. I found the firm mentioned in this Spanish financial news website, but I could find no other coverage. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. My own searches confirm the same; Chinese results are mostly adverts, listings, blogs, and PR. This subject appears to fails WP:ORG, and probably also specifically WP:COMPANY for its rather promotional nature combined with a lack of significant coverage by WP:RS. JFHJr (㊟) 05:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:07, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG, I was doing same search for sources at the same time as the nominator and came up also empty handed. Mtking (edits) 05:37, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Law firms need some kind of long term historical significance before they become appropriate subjects for encyclopedia articles. Nothing I can find in English establishes that, and most of the Chinese language links are internal. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.