Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaskulnikov's identity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zaskulnikov's identity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems that the term was introduced by the author of the article in arXiv paper. The paper was not published in peer-reviewed journal, was not cited, and no evidence of the use this indentity or calls it by this name Alexei Kopylov (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:09, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - needs input from the Mathematics/Physic crowd, but I'm not seeing any suggestion from the scholar google search that this term is a thing. JMWt (talk) 11:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find no secondary sources independent of the creator for this identity. With no reliable sources, this topic fails WP:GNG notability thresholds. --Mark viking (talk) 20:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources mentioning this or even a peer-reviewed primary source (even just that alone would fail GNG). Kingofaces43 (talk) 22:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neologism not yet shown to be notable. Smmurphy^(Talk) 00:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.