- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. GedUK 14:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Zeath os (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. Article was basically copied from Cr OS Linux, version numbers and all, so how would most of it even be true? —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears entirely non-notable. Article has no sources that would prove otherwise. — daranz [ t ] 15:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Cannot find sources to support notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Linux distribution/software article of unclear notability. Lacks independent RS references. A search did not reveal any significant coverage, just (mostly non-english) blogs and download sites. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 21:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.