Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zebpay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zebpay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Zebpay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability per WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH not established, sources are not reputable (bitcoin.com), primary blogs (zebpay blog), or not in-depth with no independent research (businesstoday.in) Ysangkok (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - even the one RS, Livemint, is notably lacking in WP:CORPDEPTH. I also removed crypto site refs - David Gerard (talk) 09:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As per nom. 1Pumpkin (talk) 11:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILL and total lack of WP:RS. Bearian (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.