- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Zegeta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable video game. Fails WP:GNG, WP:V. Mediran (t • c) 09:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not appear to have received significant coverage in any reliable secondary sources, as required by WP:N. Note that article of the game's creator has just a second ago been speedy deleted for CSD:A7. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. Doesn't fail WP:V, I have found sources on it. Definitely fails WP:GNG. Revolution1221 (talk) 00:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.