Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeisel number

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeisel number

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Zeisel number (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find more sources about the Zeisel number. Most of the engine searches as in Google Books or Google Scholar shows the Zeisel number is related to chemistry instead of mathematics. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 August 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Although I think OEIS is reliable, I am unwilling to admit it as evidence for notability for sequences (too indiscriminate), and MathWorld is worse (not as reliable and too packed with neologisms). Everything else is unreliable web pages and forum postings. We have no actual publications on this topic. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The OEIS is reliable but indiscriminate, so merely appearing there isn't enough to justify an article here. MathWorld has a history of not being good enough (I gathered some examples here). A literature search doesn't find anything we can use. XOR'easter (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.