- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:43, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Zenergo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough to satisfy WP:CORP Vanadus (talk | contribs) 01:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I agree. It does not fall under WP:CORP (Salad King) talk 09:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingofthesalads (talk • contribs) [reply]
Delete: Per nom. PaintedCarpet (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: an activity and interest-focused online service designed for consumers to manage, plan and expand their social life in their real world. References to "Killer Startups" and other online trade spamblogs do not establish notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I didn't see any notable sources on Google and Yahoo aside from a bizjournal article announcing their launch. SwisterTwister talk 22:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.