- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The WordsmithCommunicate 04:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Zenith Provecta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nom. Article was PRODded citing "No indication of notability". Article creator objected but did not know to remove the template. Ϫ 11:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.
- Delete. Looks like a clear intention to advertise to me. Could be salvaged if someone can track down some secondary sources to establish notability. -- Ϫ 11:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but needs to be heavily despammed. See the following examples of coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] -- Whpq (talk) 17:11, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - to promotional, and while I accept the ref's above from Whpq, they are not really significant enough to get over WP:CORP, they are from either local papers or from the trade publication Fleet News. Codf1977 (talk) 13:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - trade publications are perfectly valid sources so long as they are independent of teh subject. -- Whpq (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not saying it is not valid, just not very significant in terms of assessing coverage. Codf1977 (talk) 13:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.