- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 09:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ZeroDivide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article on relatively minor non-notable philanthropy. It's been here since Jan 2009. I have been unable to find sources to show notability. DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:N.-PlasmaDragon (talk) 02:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All I could find at Google News Archive was passing mentions and press releases. The article has two External Links, but they do not appear to mention the group. --MelanieN (talk) 21:13, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems to be a worthy cause, but clearly does not meet the general notability guideline. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.