- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Zero drop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I previously prodded this one. However, it got restored for being a contested prod. Looks like sneaky spam for runnatural.org, judging by the external links included in the article. Alexius08 (talk) 04:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-primary sourcing (ie sourcing that can be easily sourced back to runnatural.org) is non-existent, as far as I can tell. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 05:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Essentially an advertisement for runnatural.org. Apparently "zero drop" is a term used to describe some running shoes [1][2], but I can't find that the term is notable enough to warrant its own article. If someone can find more sources that this term is in fact notable, and the article is rewritten accordingly, I might reconsider. PDCook (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an Advertisement. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.