Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zigima Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bright Chimezie. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zigima Sound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. It is a local genre of music with no evidence of notability. Zigima sound fails the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of "Bright Chimezie". Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I suggest the article be merged with Bright Chimezie because it is a genre of music synonimous to him OluwaCurtis The King : talk to me 14:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I usually don't expect anything different from a "keep" or "merge" and sometime "redirect" vote from an article creator when their ridiculous articles get nominated for deletion through WP:AfD because editors rarely want their articles or contributions deleted. However, there is actually nothing in the article to merge to Bright Chimezie, the context of the article (Zigima Sound) had already been covered in the Bright Chimezie's article and obviously nothing can be written further about the Zigima Sound's article beyond its current state, hence my inclination and disposition for the article's deletion. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 14:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 12:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.