- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There was a prod disagreement, so I'm sending this over here. There are references here, but they give no evidence as to why this website might be notable. NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 17:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:WEB says "Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance." So far its only achievements or impact seem to have been making a couple of technology sites ([1], [2] for example) speculate on what it might be but come to basically no conclusions. That hardly seems like significant enough coverage to meet WP:N. When Creative Labs sees fit to announce what the site is for, we can recreate the article or add a section to the company's article if it turns out to be significant. Olaf Davis (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also: the two 'references' currently in the article are a link to Zii itself and this, which as far as I can see has no relevance beyond the words 'stem cell'. Olaf Davis (talk) 18:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:WEB. Schuym1 (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Agree with Olaf Davis. A mystery website is hardly notable. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.