Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zimbabwean cultural practices
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Eluchil404 20:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Zimbabwean cultural practices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Many section titles, but no encyclopedic content since April 2007 creation. Was a prod, but author challenged in-article stating [the entry] was "inviting those who know the culture to contribute", thereby failing prod's "uncontroversial" req. Michael Devore 22:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete one subhead has content - and this consists of unsourced OR. The others are empty. I further note that Culture of Zimbabwe exists and actually has content. Bigdaddy1981 22:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Bigdaddy1981. The page probably should be made into a redirect to Culture of Zimbabwe. Sxeptomaniac 22:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as suggested above as their is virtually no content.--JForget 23:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Suffers from American cultural practice of starting a project and then abandoning it. Mandsford 23:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Is a comment like that really necessary? Corpx 04:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, not really. By and large, most of the comments made in AfD aren't really necessary. Mr. Devore is right, however, that there has been nothing added for nearly four months. Mandsford 21:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.