- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Zip code 03266 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zip Code 30052 - individual Zip Codes are not notable. I proposed this page for deletion, I then found that the PROD disappeared. Checking the page history, I saw that this has happened several times already Ratzd'mishukribo (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just delete -- there is nothing notable about this zip code... Seems to be regularly rolled back whenever deletion is proposed. @SmithAndTeam (talk) 20:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - individual zip codes not notable? Lies! What about Zip code 90210... LOL. Yeah, nothing particularly notable about this zip code. Stalwart111 (talk) 04:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP is not a postal directory, an indiscriminate collection of information, or a copy of census data. There is nothing notable about this zip code as a search reveals. It doesn't inherit notability from the region it covers. Churn and change (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zip codes are directory information for the post office and nothing more, and they are changed arbitrarily as needed. Mangoe (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: See also ZIP Code 33461, which is under PROD right now. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a directory for zip codes.--xanchester (t) 03:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.