- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Zoey Beckner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable vanity page for very minor athlete Restepc (talk) 17:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ah hell what's going on here....Restepc (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article has no quality, or importance. DeadmanUndertaker 18:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete For the same rationale as already outlined on the very article's talk page. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 21:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sickening vanity. JuJube (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete has been tagged since Aug 2007. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.