Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoids Graphics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zoids. Cirt (talk) 18:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zoids Graphics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just a very trivial list of toys. Notability is not asserted. TTN (talk) 18:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No independent notability here - just trivia. Eusebeus (talk) 21:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Zoids. Seems a good solution per WP:BEFORE. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 21:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to Zoids per nom. One of the plethora of Zoids articles up for AfD. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 06:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zoids. Was unable to find any sources via a cursory google news/web search and through a print database search that met the significance criteria for the general notablity guideline. Martin Raybourne (talk) 20:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence that the actual name is Zoids Graphics, fails WP:V. Abductive (reasoning) 22:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the name is plainly accurate since you can buy it here. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.