This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 10:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be nonsense (tho' not patent nonsense). Looking at the first few pages of hits I didn't see anything encyclopedic; mostly forums and coincidental pairings of the words. It might refer to a video game species--if anyone can figure out which one, maybe a redir is in order. Niteowlneils 00:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete coincidental pairings would be my guess as to the number of google hits. Dismas|(talk) 00:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 01:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-sense. *drew 02:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Probably some sort of D&D monster or some enemy from a computer game, but the article doesn't say. Such things should ordinarily be merged into the main article on the book/game/universe or a list of characters or monsters but without any clue as to where, this article should go. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:54, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Funny, but sadly, nonsense. (I love the tone, by the way) Alas, it appears non-notable. -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 23:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete..::Imdaking::. TLK | Y! 05:26, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom--Isotope23 20:24, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.