Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zopo Color C3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zopo Mobile § Color Series. MBisanz ^talk 13:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zopo Color C3

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear advertising as both the information and sources are exactly that, either specifying only what the company would advertise about itself or republishing it, both of which are quite the same, regardless of publication and name, and WP:NOT policy explicitly allows such removal, as Wikipedia is not an advertising webhost. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. Spam sourced to product summaries. Non notable product. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Promotional material can be cut. The product is clearly notable: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Adam9007 (talk) 22:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - These are all indie try blogs anf one of them, Livemint, is in fact a known paid PR host, thus because none of them are actually significant, there's no confidence of notability (I'll note that I've never even heard of these websites except for the 1 paid PR). SwisterTwister talk 23:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has been reviewed in a number of rs for chinese products, articles should not just be concentrated on big brands such as Apple and Samsung which is the consequence of these deletion nominations. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not here to correct the media's bias. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Zopo Mobile#Product Series and consider a more general Zopo Color article for all the minor variation being spammed here seperately. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, (warning: sarcasm alert for 1st bit) - "It offers a variety of back covers, including rose gold, champagne gold, marine blue, classic black and silver.", WOW!!!, different colored back covers, amazing!!!, lets 1st have an article on the company that makes these phones, then a break out to a model series article if necessary, not articles on every variety, this and the other Zopos looks like WP:PROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. Not independently notable. Gnome de plume (talk) 15:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for now to Zopo Mobile § Color Series. The topic has received some independent coverage (e.g. Mint article), but many available sources are not reliable per Wikipedia's standards, or are routine in nature. Some sources are reliable, but are using content that appears to originate from the manufacturer (e.g. this NDTV article). No prejudice against recreation if the topic receives more independent, significant coverage in reliable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.