Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AMbot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

AMbot

Operator: After Midnight

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Start each run with manual assist and then automatic from there

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Summary: Categorization work per CFD

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): as needed to fulfill requests at CFD

Edit rate requested: 5 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: AMbot will run with AWB. I will start each run manually to confirm function and edit summaries and then will switch to automatic mode. I will take instruction to delete categories or recategorize based on instructions at Wikipedia:CFDW. I will also be able to do some tasks which normally would require manual editing, such as those found at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual#Multiple merge targets. I have already tested this functionality in AWB manually, by previewing edits only, but have pressed ignore on each and have not actually made any edits.

Discussion

Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. up to 100 edits. Martinp23 21:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed 36 edits, one run was for a multiple rename target, the other was for a simple rename. One of the edits is out of order due me clicking ignore once instead of save. User contribs is currently seriously lagged, so it may be a while before the edits show up in the bot's contribs. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-merges come up with some regularity on CFD, therefore a bot like this would be very useful. Thanks AM! >Radiant< 13:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to hold off approving this for a bit based on [1], pending AM's response on IRC or here :) Martinp23 21:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. - problem solved. Martinp23 21:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.