Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Botz
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Operator: Sebcaen
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted (always)
Programming Language(s): Pywikipediabot
Function Summary: Interwiki links on sport's articles.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): daily
Edit rate requested: 4-5 edits per minutes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): fr
Function Details:
Discussion
editWhy was this bot put directly into trials? Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 09:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
See now I see no reason to get snippy about this. Many interwiki bots don't even bother to get approval here or don't know to. It's been pretty standard practice for interwiki bots to work for a while without approval and to later get speedy approval anyway. It's a formality to determine if a bot flag is necessary, which it usually is for these types of edits. I don't fault anyone for not being familar with the bot approval process here. Simple mistake. In addition, the bot immediately stopped when the complaint above was made, demonstrating good faith.
Speedily Approved (interwiki bot). This bot is approved to run with a bot flag without need for a trial period. It already has a bot flag on the fr wikipedia and I looked at a sample of the edits so far and everything checked out. It should be run manually assisted always, as specified above. -- RM 04:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.